Yes and the DummyForm feature *can* be used with any JSF impl - at least theoretically ;-). But if people want to use this feature (ie. having commandlinks without an enclosing form) they should do so by relying on tomahawk not on the myfaces impl.
Manfred On 3/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/9/06, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In general terms, > > > > If a feature of MyFaces can be implemented in a JSF-independent way, > > put it in tomahawk so everyone can take advantage of it. > > > > If a feature of MyFaces requires special code in impl so that it > > cannot be used elsewhere, then it should be configurable, and the > > feature should probably be disabled by default. > > > > However, we shouldn't dump a potential feature just because it's only > > usable in our implementation. > > Oops. Hit submit too soon... > > ...And we also shouldn't put an impl feature in tomahawk unless it's > something that can be used with any JSF implementation. Such > impl-dependent features should stay in impl. >
