>@Dennis, you don't see the necessities to start with the major >features of the 1.2 implementation right now, even when TC 6.0 is not >yet available?
Yes, 1.2 is important. But I am under the impression I can use facelets until TC 6 is released. Besides, most of the work I do in core is in Junit rather than a container. Dennis Byrne >regards, > >Martin > >On 5/24/06, Dennis Byrne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Please no multiple branches. Thanks. >> >> Dennis Byrne >> >> >-----Original Message----- >> >From: Sean Schofield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Sent: Wednesday, May 24, 2006 12:56 PM >> >To: 'MyFaces Development', [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces >> >Committers/Contributors meeting] >> > >> >OK so Stan is past the TC 5.5 point. Why do we need two branches? >> >Can't we just say that 1.2 depends on TC 6.0 or Glassfish? I still >> >think we need to do everything we can to avoid multiple branches. >> > >> >Sean >> > >> >On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> No. The current build should be compatible again - if I don't have old >> >> information here... >> >> >> >> regards, >> >> >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> On 5/24/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > So does this mean that our Tomahawk releases are no longer compatible >> >> > with the RI? That's our current problem right? >> >> > >> >> > Sean >> >> > >> >> > On 5/24/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > There is no 1.1 compliant way of fixing dummyform - there just isn't. >> >> > > >> >> > > I would have gone with a single branch for 1.2 and checking in TC5.5 >> >> > > compatible stuff only, but Stan has already worked on 1.2, and he has >> >> > > implemented also TC6 depending things, so no chance to go with this, >> >> > > except we want to loose what Stan did, and I wouldn't. >> >> > > >> >> > > I want to do development on the 1.1 branch for bugfixes only anymore. >> >> > > 1.2 is our future, and we should go there! >> >> > > >> >> > > regards, >> >> > > >> >> > > Martin >> >> > > >> >> > > On 5/23/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > Are we talking about the fix for DummyForm? Are we not going to >> >> > > > attempt to have a 1.1 compatible fix? What about a single branch >> >> > > > for >> >> > > > 1.2 and only check in the Tomcat 5.5 compatible stuff? >> >> > > > >> >> > > > I agree with Craig that you don't want to be actively developing on >> >> > > > the trunk plus two branches. Trust me, its difficult enough >> >> > > > managing >> >> > > > this when we have a short-lived branch for a release. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > -1 for a long-term double branch strategy. >> >> > > > >> >> > > > Sean >> >> > > > >> >> > > > On 5/23/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > It's just that we need the 1.2 features for several things we >> >> > > > > want to >> >> > > > > fix right now - and TC6 is still not released, so we can't work >> >> > > > > with >> >> > > > > the full feature set of 1.2. >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > regards, >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Martin >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > On 5/22/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > Why is there a need to have a separate branch for TC6 vs. TC55. >> >> > > > > > Sorry >> >> > > > > > if I missed the discussion on the need for this ... >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > > On 5/22/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > Hi Craig, >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > critical fixes to 1.1. -> 1.1 branch >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > major development --> trunk >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > special things for 1.2 under TC6 only --> 1.2 branch >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > With this, it should be albe to merge down the 1.2 branch to >> >> > > > > > > the trunk, right? >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > regards, >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Martin >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > On 5/22/06, Craig McClanahan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > On 5/21/06, Martin Marinschek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > Ok, >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > one more addition to the discussion - I'll want to >> >> > > > > > > > > branches. One for >> >> > > > > > > > > JSF1.2 things which cannot be used together with Tomcat >> >> > > > > > > > > 5.5 and, one >> >> > > > > > > > > for JSF1.2 things which can be used with Tomcat 5.5. I'd >> >> > > > > > > > > love trunk to >> >> > > > > > > > > be the JSF1.2/Tomcat 5.5 branch, and have bug fixes for >> >> > > > > > > > > 1.1 on a real >> >> > > > > > > > > branch. >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > summary: >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > 1.1 --> branch >> >> > > > > > > > > 1.2 Tomcat 6 --> branch >> >> > > > > > > > > 1.2 Tomcat 5.5. --> trunk >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > is that ok? >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Wouldn't this mean that every change that worked under 5.5 >> >> > > > > > > > would need to be >> >> > > > > > > > committed to both branches? That seems like a good way to >> >> > > > > > > > slow down the >> >> > > > > > > > effort to achieve 1.2 compliance. >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > regards, >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Martin >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > Craig >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > On 5/19/06, Stan Silvert < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > That would be fine. After I am done we may need some >> >> > > > > > > > > > help from Sean. >> >> > > > > > > > > > He was talking about putting Tomcat 6 jars in an Apache >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven >> >> > > > > > > > > > repository. >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > I've been building with NetBeans and not Maven. So >> >> > > > > > > > > > someone who is more >> >> > > > > > > > > > Maven savvy will need to update things so it builds >> >> > > > > > > > > > correctly. I don't >> >> > > > > > > > > > think it will be more complicated than adding and >> >> > > > > > > > > > removing some >> >> > > > > > > > > > dependencies. >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert >> >> > > > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. >> >> > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> >> > > > > > > > > > > From: Manfred Geiler [mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, May 18, 2006 8:48 PM >> >> > > > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: JavaOne MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Sean, >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Can you please make a copy of the current trunk to >> >> > > > > > > > > > > /myfaces/core/branches/jsf_1_2 ? >> >> > > > > > > > > > > After that, Stan can simply (?) merge his stuff >> >> > > > > > > > > > > inside that. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Is that ok, Stan? >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Manfred >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > You want a 1.2 branch for core only using the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > latest trunk right? I >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > can create it for you if you want ... >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > Sean >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Martin Marinschek < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Manfred, can you go ahead with that 1.2 branch? >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > regards, >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Martin >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Thomas Spiegl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm having a look at tomahawk 416 >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for creating a 1.2 branch >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/18/06, Stan Silvert <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have implemented most of the new core API's >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > and fixed most >> >> > > > > > > > > > of >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > deprecated ones to be backwards compatible >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > with 1.1 (if you >> >> > > > > > > > > > look >> >> > > > > > > > > > > at the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.2 javadocs you'll see what I mean). If you >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > look at the >> >> > > > > > > > > > section >> >> > > > > > > > > > > in the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > spec preface entitled "What's Changed Since >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the Last Release" >> >> > > > > > > > > > you >> >> > > > > > > > > > > can >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get a feel for what I did. I've pretty much >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done everything >> >> > > > > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > > > > > > that >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > list. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Most of it is covered under this issue, which >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just says to >> >> > > > > > > > > > > implement >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > several sections of the spec: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-1274 >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I believe all of 1274 is complete except >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ApplicationImpl.getResourceBundle (). I >> >> > > > > > > > needed code that reads >> >> > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > new >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > faces-context.xml for that one. However, all >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the ELResolver >> >> > > > > > > > > > stuff >> >> > > > > > > > > > > is >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > done including the ResourceBundleELResolver. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I've also done some of the issues listed >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > under General >> >> > > > > > > > > > Changes. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > For >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > each item in that list, I created a Jira >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > task. You can look >> >> > > > > > > > > > at >> >> > > > > > > > > > > Jira and >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > see which ones I did. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I was just getting started on the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > javax.faces.webapp package >> >> > > > > > > > > > when >> >> > > > > > > > > > > I was >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > taken off of the project. I probably won't >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > commit any changes >> >> > > > > > > > > > > from >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that. I didn't touch the components or >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > renderer at all. With >> >> > > > > > > > > > all >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > backward-compatible code I wrote, it appears >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that all the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > components >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > still work even though they are written the " >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1.1 way". >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > So, hopefully, what you guys will have to >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > start with is a JSF >> >> > > > > > > > > > 1.2 >> >> > > > > > > > > > > impl >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > that is about half-way done and still works. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan Silvert >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JBoss, Inc. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > callto://stansilvert >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > From: Thomas Spiegl [mailto:[EMAIL >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED] ] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 17, 2006 4:58 PM >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To: MyFaces Development; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Subject: Re: JSF 1.2 [was: Cancelled: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JavaOne MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Committers/Contributors meeting] >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for solving tomahawk 416, being >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > incompatible to RI is a >> >> > > > > > > > > > > serious >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > issue >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan which 1.2 issues did you fix. Did you >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > change any link >> >> > > > > > > > > > > renderers? >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If not, i am >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for open a 1.2 branch >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/17/06, Werner Punz < [EMAIL >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sean Schofield schrieb: >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm -1 on the 1.2 branch. There are >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > major issues to be >> >> > > > > > > > > > > fixed in >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > core right now. (See TOMAHAWK-416 and >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > related dev >> >> > > > > > > > > > > discussions.) >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > know that Stan is anxious but given the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > lack of interest >> >> > > > > > > > > > in >> >> > > > > > > > > > > the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > core >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > trunk, its hard to imagine we have >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > enough support to >> >> > > > > > > > > > sustain >> >> > > > > > > > > > > this >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > branch. Do we have firm committments >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > from anyone else >> >> > > > > > > > > > > besides >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Stan? >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 for a fork... the reason we need to >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > get going asap and >> >> > > > > > > > > > a >> >> > > > > > > > > > > fork >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > helps. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > If we wait for another bunch of issues to >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > be fixed, this >> >> > > > > > > > > > will >> >> > > > > > > > > > > never >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > end. >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sorry to say that so harsh, but the time >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > on 1.2 is really >> >> > > > > > > > > > > pressing, >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > given that there wont be an option in jee >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > to override the >> >> > > > > > > > > > > default >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > implementation via other libs in >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > WEB-INF/lib like it was >> >> > > > > > > > > > > possible in >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JEE4 >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > -- >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > > > >> >> > > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > -- >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > > > >> >> > > > >> >> > > >> >> > > >> >> > > -- >> >> > > >> >> > > http://www.irian.at >> >> > > >> >> > > Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> > > JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> > > Courses in English and German >> >> > > >> >> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> http://www.irian.at >> >> >> >> Your JSF powerhouse - >> >> JSF Consulting, Development and >> >> Courses in English and German >> >> >> >> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >> >> >> > >> >> >> > > >-- > >http://www.irian.at > >Your JSF powerhouse - >JSF Consulting, Development and >Courses in English and German > >Professional Support for Apache MyFaces >
