corresponding war under WEB-INF/sources and have separate downloadable war for each of the examples (tiles, simple, wap...).
WEB-INF/src is mentioned in the spec as an optional *folder* for java sources. +1 on that
Another option would be to have all the wars included into a larger archive, like tomahawk-examples-1.1.3.tar.gz, and the corresponding sources packaged as jars and included into tomahawk-examples-1.1.3-src.tar.gz. This is how it worked before moving to maven.
-1
What do you think, which is more intuitive? Regards, Catalin Catalin Kormos <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Sounds great, i'll go ahead an see what else could be improved by using the new assembly plugin. Regards, Catalin Sean Schofield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: +1 but lets coordinate when you check in the resulting pom's b/c we will need to upgrade the maven instance on our contiuum server and we will want to alert users and developers. Why don't you go ahead and see what you can do? If you can simplify anything else about our assembly feel free. Sean On 5/31/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: > Could the version 2.1 of the assembly plugin be used (requires maven 2.0.4) > instead of the current 2.0-beta-1? the newer version is much more capable, > one new nice feature would be that it permits specifying more than one > assembly descriptor for the same project, making it easy to generate both > sources and binary distributions. > > Regards, > Catalin > > > Sean Schofield wrote: > > [moving this to the dev list so all can contribute] > > None of these are part of the nightly build (which is really the same > as the form release.) Right now we build with > > mvn -Pgenerate-assembly > > and then from the assembly directory > > mvn assembly:assembly > > Martin checked something in to address the source code issue but I > cannot make it work. > > Sean > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: > > Thanks. > > > > About the sandbox assembly, what you say make sense to me too, i didn't > plan > > to do that :) just gave that as an example. > > > > Are the sources, examples, or sandbox included now in the nightly builds? > > > > Regards, > > Catalin > > > > > > On 5/31/06, Sean Schofield wrote: > > > Thanks for the patch. Its been applied to the branch. AFAIK there is > > > no assembly for sandbox. The idea I think would be to not include > > > sandbox in the official release but to include it in the nightly > > > builds. You should post to the dev list about that though and see if > > > there is conensus (some users want official releases but the sandbox > > > stuff is very experimental right now.) > > > > > > Sean > > > > > > On 5/30/06, Catalin Kormos wrote: > > > > Hi Sean, > > > > > > > > Here is the patch to add the missing tag to the pages related > > > to > > > > sorting from simple examples. I couldn't find anything wrong with > > > > pagedSortTable.jsf , maybe in the meantime this got resolved. > > > > > > > > Martin ask me if i could help you out with the deployment problems, > like > > > > missing sandox.jar, sources, examples, etc. I could help with these, > if > > you > > > > need, i'll just need a little more details about this. I'm not very > > familiar > > > > with these process, but as far as i can tell, for example, sandox > > idoesn't > > > > have an assembly process at all. > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Catalin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > __________________________________________________ > Do You Yahoo!? > Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around > http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
-- Matthias Wessendorf Aechterhoek 18 48282 Emsdetten blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
