+1 for the promotion, as I remember this component was donated to myfaces in 2005 by my brother, and I think 3 years is "enough" to live in sandbox.
Cagatay. On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I understand correctly, the current state of the component is such > that it works with any UIData component. I'm +1 for keeping that > status. It'd be great if we could do something similar with many of > the other t:dataTable functionality. > > On 6/27/08, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'm +1 to promoting the component in its current state (which I think is > > your -1 option below). > > > > Thanks for looking into that. > > > > Regards, > > > > Simon > > > > > > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:24 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > I found it possible to use it with the h:dataTable as it depends only > > > on (UIData). > > > We have now two paths: > > > [+1] for merging this component as an attribute in <t:dataTable .../>. > > > [-1] for promoting the component to Tomahawk in its current state. > > > > > > Me >> -1 now. > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I think it would be useful to have an answer to my question > > > first. > > > > > > *Is* it possible to do this? > > > <h:dataTable ...> > > > <s:selectOneRow/> > > > </h:dataTable> > > > > > > If so, then moving from the current approach to using an > > > attribute will > > > remove existing functionality. Ok, with a sandbox component > > > that is > > > allowed but the above looks useful. > > > > > > Unfortunately I'm really busy on other things at the moment, > > > and don't > > > have time to look myself. > > > > > > Regards, > > > Simon > > > > > > Hazem Saleh schrieb: > > > > Any new votes ? > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 4:13 PM, simon > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > > > I only suggested leaving it as it is *if* it is possible > > > to use this > > > > component with tables other than t:dataTable. > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:57 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote: > > > > > OK Let's make this as a vote : > > > > > we now have : > > > > > -> 2 votes for supporting the feature inside the > > > t:dataTable. > > > > > -> 1 vote for leaving the current component as is. > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, simon > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > wrote: > > > > > A separate component would be nice if it could > > > be applied to > > > > > any table, > > > > > eg the h:dataTable. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 13:40 +0300, Hazem Saleh > > > wrote: > > > > > > +1 for Matzew idea. > > > > > > I think that the old component syntax was > > > suitable for the > > > > > component > > > > > > when it was in the sandbox phase. > > > > > > I will implement this idea, it is good. > > > > > > Thanks Matzew! > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Matthias > > > Wessendorf > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM, > > > Hazem Saleh > > > > > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Hi Team, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > After updating the selectOneRow > > > component's > > > > > documentation. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > just curious, what is this component > > > about? > > > > > > Using it like this ? > > > > > > > > > > > > <t:table .....> > > > > > > <s:selectOneRow /> > > > > > > </t:able> > > > > > > > > > > > > If so, how to declare multiple row > > > selection ? > > > > > > > > > > > > Trinidad's table doesn't treat that > > > as a special > > > > > case. It just > > > > > > has an > > > > > > attribute for that, where you > > > specify via an enum > > > > > the > > > > > > selection type > > > > > > (single:mulit) > > > > > > > > > > > > Greetings, > > > > > > Matthias > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I wish to promote it to the next > > > Tomahawk > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > [+1] for agreeing with promoting > > > the > > > > component to > > > > > the next > > > > > > Tomahawk release. > > > > > > > [-1] for disagreeing with > > > promoting the > > > > component > > > > > to the > > > > > > next Tomahawk > > > > > > > release. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed > > > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog > > > > >
