Congratulations! Promotion is done. On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 8:06 PM, Leonardo Uribe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1 > > > On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 1:26 AM, Cagatay Civici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> +1 for the promotion, as I remember this component was donated to myfaces >> in 2005 by my brother, and I think 3 years is "enough" to live in sandbox. >> >> Cagatay. >> >> >> On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 9:44 PM, Mike Kienenberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> If I understand correctly, the current state of the component is such >>> that it works with any UIData component. I'm +1 for keeping that >>> status. It'd be great if we could do something similar with many of >>> the other t:dataTable functionality. >>> >>> On 6/27/08, simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > I'm +1 to promoting the component in its current state (which I think >>> is >>> > your -1 option below). >>> > >>> > Thanks for looking into that. >>> > >>> > Regards, >>> > >>> > Simon >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, 2008-06-27 at 15:24 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote: >>> > > Hi Simon, >>> > > >>> > > I found it possible to use it with the h:dataTable as it depends >>> only >>> > > on (UIData). >>> > > We have now two paths: >>> > > [+1] for merging this component as an attribute in <t:dataTable >>> .../>. >>> > > [-1] for promoting the component to Tomahawk in its current state. >>> > > >>> > > Me >> -1 now. >>> > > >>> > > On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 10:04 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> > > I think it would be useful to have an answer to my question >>> > > first. >>> > > >>> > > *Is* it possible to do this? >>> > > <h:dataTable ...> >>> > > <s:selectOneRow/> >>> > > </h:dataTable> >>> > > >>> > > If so, then moving from the current approach to using an >>> > > attribute will >>> > > remove existing functionality. Ok, with a sandbox component >>> > > that is >>> > > allowed but the above looks useful. >>> > > >>> > > Unfortunately I'm really busy on other things at the moment, >>> > > and don't >>> > > have time to look myself. >>> > > >>> > > Regards, >>> > > Simon >>> > > >>> > > Hazem Saleh schrieb: >>> > > > Any new votes ? >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 4:13 PM, simon >>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > >>> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> > > > >>> > > > I only suggested leaving it as it is *if* it is >>> possible >>> > > to use this >>> > > > component with tables other than t:dataTable. >>> > > > >>> > > > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 15:57 +0300, Hazem Saleh wrote: >>> > > > > OK Let's make this as a vote : >>> > > > > we now have : >>> > > > > -> 2 votes for supporting the feature inside the >>> > > t:dataTable. >>> > > > > -> 1 vote for leaving the current component as is. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 3:13 PM, simon >>> > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > >>> > > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>> > > > > wrote: >>> > > > > A separate component would be nice if it >>> could >>> > > be applied to >>> > > > > any table, >>> > > > > eg the h:dataTable. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > >>> > > > > On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 13:40 +0300, Hazem >>> Saleh >>> > > wrote: >>> > > > > > +1 for Matzew idea. >>> > > > > > I think that the old component syntax was >>> > > suitable for the >>> > > > > component >>> > > > > > when it was in the sandbox phase. >>> > > > > > I will implement this idea, it is good. >>> > > > > > Thanks Matzew! >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 11:16 AM, Matthias >>> > > Wessendorf >>> > > >>> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: >>> > > > > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 6:16 PM, >>> > > Hazem Saleh >>> > > >>> > > > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> > > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> >>> > > >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > > > > Hi Team, >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > After updating the selectOneRow >>> > > component's >>> > > > > documentation. >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > just curious, what is this >>> component >>> > > about? >>> > > > > > Using it like this ? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > <t:table .....> >>> > > > > > <s:selectOneRow /> >>> > > > > > </t:able> >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > If so, how to declare multiple row >>> > > selection ? >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Trinidad's table doesn't treat >>> that >>> > > as a special >>> > > > > case. It just >>> > > > > > has an >>> > > > > > attribute for that, where you >>> > > specify via an enum >>> > > > > the >>> > > > > > selection type >>> > > > > > (single:mulit) >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > Greetings, >>> > > > > > Matthias >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > I wish to promote it to the next >>> > > Tomahawk >>> > > > release. >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > [+1] for agreeing with promoting >>> > > the >>> > > > component to >>> > > > > the next >>> > > > > > Tomahawk release. >>> > > > > > > [-1] for disagreeing with >>> > > promoting the >>> > > > component >>> > > > > to the >>> > > > > > next Tomahawk >>> > > > > > > release. >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed >>> > > http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> > -- Hazem Ahmed Saleh Ahmed http://www.jroller.com/page/HazemBlog
