I think skipping minors on release versions is icky, but I guess that's just me hehe.
Any takers for x.y.z for releases, with x.y.<svn> for dev? There is never a possibility they will clash unless we first do ~<current svn revision> z's per x.y Robbie > -----Original Message----- > From: Aidan Skinner [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: 22 December 2009 21:42 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: Release numbering suggestion > > On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Robert Godfrey > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > So, I'm +1 for dev builds being 0.<2x+1>.<svn rev number>, and > released > > builds being 0.<2x>.<meaningful micro version> > > Sounds like a plan to me. > > - Aidan > > -- > Apache Qpid - AMQP, JMS, other messaging love http://qpid.apache.org > "A witty saying proves nothing" - Voltaire > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation > Project: http://qpid.apache.org > Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected] --------------------------------------------------------------------- Apache Qpid - AMQP Messaging Implementation Project: http://qpid.apache.org Use/Interact: mailto:[email protected]
