[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3932?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15655192#comment-15655192
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on THRIFT-3932:
----------------------------------------
Github user jeking3 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/thrift/pull/1103
I decided to leave setDetached and not deprecate it. I don't see a reason
for someone to change from detachable to joinable (or the reverse) while
running but I believe all of the servers will properly support it because all
three join implementations check if the thread is detached_. Therefore I am
doing a force push on this one and rebased it on master as of earlier today.
Please check it and let me know if there are any more concerns; since we're
getting into the beginning of 0.11.0 development I want to get it in as early
as possible to get as much soak time as possible, given the area of work.
> C++ ThreadManager has a rare termination race
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> Key: THRIFT-3932
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/THRIFT-3932
> Project: Thrift
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: C++ - Library
> Reporter: Buğra Gedik
> Assignee: James E. King, III
> Fix For: 0.11.0
>
> Attachments: thrift-patch
>
> Time Spent: 17h
> Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> {{ThreadManger::join}} calls {{stopImpl(true)}}, which in turn calls
> {{removeWorker(workerCount_);}}. The latter waits until {{while (workerCount_
> != workerMaxCount_)}}. Within the {{run}} method of the workers, the last
> thread that detects {{workerCount_ == workerMaxCount_}} notifies
> {{removeWorker}}. The {{run}} method has the following additional code that
> is executed at the very end:
> {code}
> {
> Synchronized s(manager_->workerMonitor_);
> manager_->deadWorkers_.insert(this->thread());
> if (notifyManager) {
> manager_->workerMonitor_.notify();
> }
> }
> {code}
> This is an independent synchronized block. Now assume 2 threads. One of them
> has {{notifyManager=true}} as it detected the {{workerCount_ ==
> workerMaxCount_}} condition earlier. It is possible that this thread gets to
> execute the above code block first, {{ThreadManager}}'s {{removeWorker}}
> method unblocks, and eventually {{ThreadManager}}'s {{join}} returns and the
> object is destructed. When the other thread reaches the synchronized block
> above, it will crash, as the manager is not around anymore.
> Besides, {{ThreadManager}} never joins its threads.
> Attached is a patch.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
