+1 to releasing 1.8. -- Best regards, Konstantin Gribov
сб, 28 марта 2015, 22:25, Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]>: > I'm also leaning toward 1.8. Especially given the newly identified > regression in TIKA-1584. > > Tyler > On Mar 28, 2015 11:47 AM, "Mattmann, Chris A (3980)" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Tyler - I would VOTE for 1.8. Given the stuff associated > > with releasing (updating the website; sending emails; waiting > > periods, etc.) let’s ship all the updates we have too along > > with the jhighlight fix. > > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Chris Mattmann, Ph.D. > > Chief Architect > > Instrument Software and Science Data Systems Section (398) > > NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory Pasadena, CA 91109 USA > > Office: 168-519, Mailstop: 168-527 > > Email: [email protected] > > WWW: http://sunset.usc.edu/~mattmann/ > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science Department > > University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA 90089 USA > > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]> > > Reply-To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: Saturday, March 28, 2015 at 8:01 AM > > To: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Subject: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1 > > > > >Hi Folks, > > > > > >Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to > > >release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager > > >again. > > > > > >Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1? > > > > > >Does anyone have any last minute issues they'd like to finish and see in > > >Tika 1.X? I'd like to get the example working with CORS (TIKA-1585 and > > >TIKA-1586). Any others? > > > > > >Have a good weekend, > > >Tyler > > > > >
