Unless there are objections, I'd like these to be resolved before 1.8:
TIKA-1584 -- I'll fix
TIKA-1575 -- Resolved by Konstantin Gribov (thank you!)
TIKA-1512 -- I'll put in a temporary fix so that we don't get IOOBEs, but I'll
leave this open and do some more digging to see if we need to open a ticket at
the POI level
TIKA-1511 -- I'll remove "provided" for xerial
TIKA-1549 -- We should thank Toke Eskildsen in CHANGES.txt, no?
I'll have these fixes completed by noon EDT. Should I run against govdocs1
before or after the RC?
My last build of Tika app (a few days ago) ballooned to ~43MB, and that's
before I add ~3MB for xerial. Tika server is now ~48MB. As of my last build,
we are still including ~4MB of pdfs (README.NLDAS1.pdf and README.NLDAS2.pdf)
from the GRIB(?) parser in the tika-app and tika-server jars.
Best,
Tim
-----Original Message-----
From: Tyler Palsulich [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Sunday, March 29, 2015 9:13 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Tika 1.8 or 1.7.1
Once TIKA-1584 and TIKA-1575 are resolved, I'll work up an RC (unless
something else pops up).
Thank you everyone.
Tyler
On Mar 29, 2015 4:43 AM, "Hong-Thai Nguyen" <[email protected]> wrote:
> +1 for 1.8
>
> Hong-Thai
>
> > On 28 Mar 2015, at 16:01, Tyler Palsulich <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Folks,
> >
> > Now that TIKA-1581 (JHighlight licensing issues) is resolved, we need to
> > release a new version of Tika. I'll volunteer to be the release manager
> > again.
> >
> > Should we release this as 1.8 or 1.7.1?
> >
> > Does anyone have any last minute issues they'd like to finish and see in
> > Tika 1.X? I'd like to get the example working with CORS (TIKA-1585 and
> > TIKA-1586). Any others?
> >
> > Have a good weekend,
> > Tyler
>
