On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > I like the idea to build a new trunk from scratch for the 2.x stream >> > (OASIS) >> > and harvest things from the sca-equinox branch and 1.x branch (OSOA). >> > >> > Now we have reasonable parts covering items a, b, c, d on Sebstien's >> > list. I >> > see it as a good story for developers to develop Tuscany modules as OSGi >> > bundles with the help from Eclipse PDE. The missing feature is the maven >> > eclipse compiler doesn't report the OSGi violations yet. >> > >> > Should we start to branch off the current trunk into 1.4 branch as >> > proposed >> > at [1] as the first step? >> >> Let me handle the branching now. >> I'd also like to propose we change the equinox branch "artifact >> version" to avoid any conflicts with the 1.4 work... would >> 2.0-snapshot work ? >> > > That would be a change that needs to be voted on. Might be worth everyone > reviewing the Rules For Revolutions. >
I was about to respond to my own e-mail, let me get it right : 1.Create a 1.4 branch from trunk (this is ok, and shouldn't be a big deal) 2.Empty trunk... I wasn't planning to do it now, and I guess this is what you are suggesting to get it voted ? 3.Change the equinox branch artifact id (this should also be ok, right ?) Anyway, I'd wait for more feedback on the thread. > ...ant > > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
