On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 7:40 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:49 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 1:45 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 9:32 PM, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> >> > >> >> > I like the idea to build a new trunk from scratch for the 2.x stream >> >> > (OASIS) >> >> > and harvest things from the sca-equinox branch and 1.x branch (OSOA). >> >> > >> >> > Now we have reasonable parts covering items a, b, c, d on Sebstien's >> >> > list. I >> >> > see it as a good story for developers to develop Tuscany modules as >> >> > OSGi >> >> > bundles with the help from Eclipse PDE. The missing feature is the >> >> > maven >> >> > eclipse compiler doesn't report the OSGi violations yet. >> >> > >> >> > Should we start to branch off the current trunk into 1.4 branch as >> >> > proposed >> >> > at [1] as the first step? >> >> >> >> Let me handle the branching now. >> >> I'd also like to propose we change the equinox branch "artifact >> >> version" to avoid any conflicts with the 1.4 work... would >> >> 2.0-snapshot work ? >> >> >> >
I'll wait for a vote thread to get started before I start any changes/branches etc >> > That would be a change that needs to be voted on. Might be worth >> > everyone >> > reviewing the Rules For Revolutions. >> > >> >> I was about to respond to my own e-mail, let me get it right : >> >> 1.Create a 1.4 branch from trunk (this is ok, and shouldn't be a big deal) > > that seems fine to me > >> >> >> 2.Empty trunk... I wasn't planning to do it now, and I guess this is >> what you are suggesting to get it voted ? > > yes, i think "emptying trunk " would need a vote :) > >> >> 3.Change the equinox branch artifact id (this should also be ok, right ?) > > And i think this also needs a vote if the version is going to imply its the > "next" or future release branch. Calling it something neutral would be ok > without a vote, eg something like 1.4-equinox-SNAPSHOT > >> >> Anyway, I'd wait for more feedback on the thread. >> >> >> > ...ant >> > >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany, Apache PhotArk http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
