On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > +1 - there are many advantages to customers and developers for supporting > OASIS versions. > > ant elder wrote: >> >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Simon Laws >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: >> >>> As per me previous mail I propose that we start to think about >>> implementing >>> an OASIS compliant version of Tuscany SCA Java. We can't declare OASIS >>> compliance until the specifications are actually done but I think we need >>> to >>> start soon so that we are ready. Specifically this means creating two >>> development streams; >>> >>> One (in a branch with a 1.x-SNAPSHOT label) to support our existing >>> OSOA code base >>> One (in trunk with a 2.x-SNAPSHOT label) to build support for the >>> OASIS >>> versions of the SCA specifications >>> >>> What actually goes in trunk to kick off the OASIS development is the >>> subject of further discussion. >>> >>> Here's my +1 >>> >> >> +1, this seems like the best chance we have to move forward in a >> productive >> way from where we are now. > > > -- > Thanks, Dan Becker >
+1. I do not see how this could be a bad thing. -- I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who.
