On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 10:16 AM, Monde Hans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 4:46 PM, Dan Becker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 - there are many advantages to customers and developers for supporting > > OASIS versions. > > > > ant elder wrote: > >> > >> On Fri, Nov 7, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Simon Laws > >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> > >>> As per me previous mail I propose that we start to think about > >>> implementing > >>> an OASIS compliant version of Tuscany SCA Java. We can't declare OASIS > >>> compliance until the specifications are actually done but I think we > need > >>> to > >>> start soon so that we are ready. Specifically this means creating two > >>> development streams; > >>> > >>> One (in a branch with a 1.x-SNAPSHOT label) to support our existing > >>> OSOA code base > >>> One (in trunk with a 2.x-SNAPSHOT label) to build support for the > >>> OASIS > >>> versions of the SCA specifications > >>> > >>> What actually goes in trunk to kick off the OASIS development is the > >>> subject of further discussion. > >>> > >>> Here's my +1 > >>> > >> > >> +1, this seems like the best chance we have to move forward in a > >> productive > >> way from where we are now. > > > > > > -- > > Thanks, Dan Becker > > > > +1. > I do not see how this could be a bad thing. > > > -- > I keep six honest serving-men (They taught me all I knew); Their names > are What and Why and When And How and Where and Who. > This vote passes with a tally of no -1 and 10 +1 from Simon Laws Ramkumar Ramalingam Ant Elder Dan Becker Vamsavardhana Reddy Raymond Feng Luciano Resende Feng Wang Mark Combellack Monde Hans Before we go ahead and enact this decision we need to decide two things. 1 - What the starting point for the OASIS development in trunk will be 2 - What other things we want to do now we have the opportunity of development I'll start separate discussions. Thanks Simon
