On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > Simon Nash wrote: > >> ant elder wrote: >> >>> oops, didn't go to the dev list... >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:11 PM, ant elder <[email protected] <mailto: >>> [email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 4:02 PM, Luciano Resende >>> <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > - sca-contribution.xsd in the eclipse plugin core module has >>> an AL header >>> > instead of OASIS >>> > >>> >>> The SCA Spec did not have schemas for sca-contribution.xsd, >>> that's why >>> we have AL header. >>> >>> >>> The latest specs do though right? So the AL doesn't seem right to me. >>> >>> >>> > - There's a Constants class in the SCA-API module with an AL >>> header, should >>> > this have a OASIS header or should the Constants class not be >>> used? Need to >>> > check the specs but If the class isn't defined in a spec i >>> think the class >>> > should be removed from the sca-api module. >>> > >>> >>> Same here, this is a Tuscany constant class. >>> >>> >>> Right, so it shouldn't be in the org.oasisopen.sca package or in the >>> sca-api module should it? >>> >>> This interface (not class) is defined by both the OSOA and OASIS specs. >> >> FYI, it's a bit hard to find... see lines 1831 through 1838 in the > OSOA SCA 1.0 JavaCAA spec. > > Thanks for the pointer, i've updated the code with the correct header in r743410
...ant
