Hi,

2013/1/14 Rob Campbell <[email protected]>

> If interoperability ever does become a concern (we want to debug chrome
> through the Firefox debugger for example),


I think the concern is a bit different than that. An interoperable
protocole will allow web developers to use third party tools that will
allow them to debug both Chrome and Firefox (and any browser that will
implement it) at the same time. I think about IDE or extensible text
editors (such as Vim or Sublime Text). Everything that could help web
developer to be more productive will be blessed. It's not just about having
nice tools inside the browsers, it's also the ability to plug them to other
tools. This is especially true in the mobile world where it is not possible
(or it's very difficult) to access directly to the browser. As an example,
I love Adobe Edge Inspect (http://html.adobe.com/edge/inspect/) that
prevent ours of work on mobile WebKit browsers. The interoperability on
such subjects is a key factor to see the "Web as a platform" becoming
something more than a simple marketing buzz word.


> we could probably implement a protocol translation layer to talk to a
> foreign browser / debugger server. That way we could keep the nice features
> of our protocol and still have the capability to talk to other browsers.
> And vice versa. We'd also not have to rewrite our debugger's innards from
> scratch.
>
> That might be a fun summer of code project.
>

That sounds like a great idea :D

Best,
-- 
Jeremie
.............................
Web : http://jeremie.patonnier.net
Twitter : @JeremiePat <http://twitter.com/JeremiePat>
_______________________________________________
dev-b2g mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g

Reply via email to