----- Original Message ----- > > On 04-03-13 08:46, Lawrence Mandel wrote: >
> > > I think this type of information gathering is tricky at best. > > > It's > > > possible that a news article or other non Mozilla source may > > > contain > > > information that is speculative. This information, whether > > > correct > > > or not, may not be appropriate for Mozilla to list or disclose. > > > Elsewhere in this thread someone suggested using wikipedia, which > > > I > > > think is a better idea than hosting this information on wikimo or > > > another official Mozilla source. > > > > I would vote for it to be on the Mozilla wiki so that Mozillians who > blog about it can link back to an official source. The scenario that I'd like us to avoid is that someone adds a partner/date/launch market/etc. to the wiki citing an article (or without a citation). This information is then picked up and blogged by someone else in the Mozilla community adding weight to something that was speculative to start. I agree that it's preferable to have this information on our wiki from a sourcing perspective and because this is where we all keep our information. If the general thought is that the risk is low, let's do that. Lawrence _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
