----- Original Message ----- > On 04-03-13 08:46, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > > I think this type of information gathering is tricky at best. It's > > possible that a news article or other non Mozilla source may > > contain > > information that is speculative. This information, whether correct > > or > > not, may not be appropriate for Mozilla to list or disclose. > > Elsewhere > > in this thread someone suggested using wikipedia, which I think is > > a > > better idea than hosting this information on wikimo or another > > official Mozilla source. > Lawrence, > > Wikipedia needs a citation for every fact stated.
Well, ideally. I've read many Wikipedia articles that lack citations. > In the absence of > an > official Mozilla press release, the only other citations are news > articles. > Information gathered on a Mozilla wiki page can be scrutinized by a > number of people within Mozilla to ensure that it only contains > information appropriate for Mozilla to disclose. > I'm suggesting that we shouldn't promote any partner related information that has not publicly been disclosed from a Mozilla source (press release, blog post, etc.). Just because information has been published in an article doesn't mean that it is correct. Lawrence _______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
