So to clarify, if I flash v188 base image to a flame device, then do a full flash of latest master branch or 2.1 branch (i.e. flashing “image” in B2G-flash-tool), it actually overwrites the base image with OLDER files? If this is the case then we should stop full flashing until it’s fixed. After I did a full flash, Bootloader value still said v188, so I thought everything was okay. We we told to do full flash on device to take the latest changes in gonk layer I believe.
Thanks, No-Jun > On Oct 24, 2014, at 5:46 AM, Shawn Huang <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Tony, > I found that Bug 1088339 can actually respond my previous question, the > current PVT images do not contain the latest V188 binary files (vendor's HAL > libraries). > If QA flash v188 base images and full flash PVT images again, the latest > binary files will not be the same as the original v188 binary files. > We have to make sure auto build system uses the latest extract binary files. > We cannot expect everyone to only perform shallow-flash. > > Shawn > ----- 原始郵件 ----- > 寄件者: "Shawn Huang" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > 收件者: "Tony Chung" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > 副本: "qa-b2g" <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, > "<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, "dev-b2g" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > 寄件備份: 2014 10 月 23 星期四 下午 7:01:08 > 主旨: Re: [b2g] FxOS QA testing of 2.1, m-c: Flame (v188 image) > > Hi Tony, > How can we make sure PVT full flash images include v188 binary files (under > backup-flame folder)? > Does auto-build system always use the latest base image binary files? > > Shawn Huang > >> Tony Chung <[email protected]> 於 2014年10月23日 上午2:10 寫道： >> >> Hi all, >> >> This is just a friendly notice that the starting this week, FxOS QA team has >> shifted our 2.1 and mozilla-central build testing over the Flame’s v188 base >> image. All the reports you see posted to bugzilla, these mailing threads, >> and [email protected], will be using this image. We have >> evaluated that this image works well and is compatible with mozilla builds. >> >> for those internal that are running performance, stability, battery life >> testing, and any other development, i suggest you also move to v188 as your >> base image, and then either full or shallow flash gaia/gecko over it as you >> desire. >> >> For the public with flames, i’m told that v188 will be updated on MDN soon. >> >> >> Thanks >> Tony >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-b2g mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g > _______________________________________________ > dev-b2g mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g > <https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g> > _______________________________________________ > Qa-b2g mailing list > [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/qa-b2g > <https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/qa-b2g>
_______________________________________________ dev-b2g mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-b2g
