The branch main has been updated by dim:

URL: 
https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3cdb6c9d92ecf479a0df338267f3f844ef6feeb2

commit 3cdb6c9d92ecf479a0df338267f3f844ef6feeb2
Author:     Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>
AuthorDate: 2026-01-23 17:31:53 +0000
Commit:     Dimitry Andric <[email protected]>
CommitDate: 2026-01-23 17:33:23 +0000

    libc++ inttypes.h: define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS and __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
    
    Before transitively including the base version of inttypes.h, define
    __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS and __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS, because the base
    inttypes.h directly includes sys/stdint.h, instead of going through the
    'regular' stdint.h.
    
    The libc++ version of the latter does define those macros, to ensure
    things like UINT64_C() and SIZE_MAX are defined even in C++98 or C++03.
    
    MFC after:      3 days
---
 contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/inttypes.h | 11 +++++++++--
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/inttypes.h 
b/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/inttypes.h
index 8664412bd52f..501cb1c11d53 100644
--- a/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/inttypes.h
+++ b/contrib/llvm-project/libcxx/include/inttypes.h
@@ -241,12 +241,19 @@ uintmax_t wcstoumax(const wchar_t* restrict nptr, 
wchar_t** restrict endptr, int
 #  pragma GCC system_header
 #endif
 
-/* C99 stdlib (e.g. glibc < 2.18) does not provide format macros needed
-   for C++11 unless __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS is defined
+/* C99 stdlib (e.g. glibc < 2.18) does not provide macros needed
+   for C++11 unless __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS, __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
+   and __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS are defined
 */
+#if defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS)
+#  define __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS
+#endif
 #if defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(__STDC_FORMAT_MACROS)
 #  define __STDC_FORMAT_MACROS
 #endif
+#if defined(__cplusplus) && !defined(__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS)
+#  define __STDC_LIMIT_MACROS
+#endif
 
 #if __has_include_next(<inttypes.h>)
 #  include_next <inttypes.h>

Reply via email to