> So: ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", "instead of" afii10034.
>
> What do you suggest? I guess that adobename might need to have
> multiple entries anyway.
Obviously, the decimal number 10034 has been abusively transformed
into its hexadecimal equivalent, I guess by table.serialize or something
similar. It seems to be the case for all the other glyphs with an AFII
name, and I consider this a mistake. I think it should be reverted back.
Arthur
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
