Arthur Reutenauer wrote:
>> So: ["adobename"]="afii0x2732", "instead of" afii10034.
>>
>> What do you suggest? I guess that adobename might need to have
>> multiple entries anyway.
>
> Obviously, the decimal number 10034 has been abusively transformed
> into its hexadecimal equivalent, I guess by table.serialize or something
> similar. It seems to be the case for all the other glyphs with an AFII
> name, and I consider this a mistake. I think it should be reverted back.
hm, i wonder if/when i touched them
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | fax: 038 477 53 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
