On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 13:15, Hans Hagen <pra...@wxs.nl> wrote: > On 6-10-2010 1:00, Taco Hoekwater wrote: > >>> Should we ask Dick to fix texmfcnf.lua to handle both >>> old and new ConTeXt? But most important of all - why doesn't ConTeXt > > in what respect old and new? mkii does not use that file
Not MKII, but old meaning "MKIV before March 2010" that was using a different format of texmfcnf.lua. >>> handle that already? (Why doesn't it find several versions of >>> configuration file and just overloads the important bits?) > > afaik you can have several texmfcnf.lua files > > mtxrun  texmfcnf.lua > > reports what it will load (two files on my machine as I have to add dev > paths/trees) Well, on my machine (after updating ConTeXt from Taco's repository) it reports: > mtxrun texmfcnf.lua MTXrun | unknown script 'mtx-base.lua' or 'mtx-mtx-base.lua' Mojca _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
