On 29-3-2012 18:38, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
Am 29.03.2012 um 11:30 schrieb Hans Hagen:
On 29-3-2012 10:46, Wolfgang Schuster wrote:
To many names aren’t a good solution but when I have to make a decision I would
choose \definecounter because it’s the name which makes more sense. The only
thing (besides backward compatibility) is the \makecounter mechanism which use
the following commands:
So will we drop the number ones then?
This would only work when you also drop \makecounter because it won’t be usable
anymore when \definenumber will be changed to \definecounter.
Well, a direct consequence of removing all 'structure' from
'structurecounter' is indeed that we get \definecounter and therefore
need to drop the ones in syst-aux (no big deal as they are only used a
few times and nowadays we have more than enough \count's; we can always
turn them into \definevaluecounter or so if needed).
Anyhow, I already did a lot of editing so there's no going back now ...
I'm making a beta that you can check in a while. In the process
\currentstructurecounter has become \currentsectioncountervalue and some
macros got value appended as well.
Hans
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Hans Hagen | PRAGMA ADE
Ridderstraat 27 | 8061 GH Hasselt | The Netherlands
tel: 038 477 53 69 | voip: 087 875 68 74 | www.pragma-ade.com
| www.pragma-pod.nl
-----------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
dev-context mailing list
dev-context@ntg.nl
http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
