Am 29.03.2012 um 19:23 schrieb Hans Hagen: > On 29-3-2012 18:38, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >> >> Am 29.03.2012 um 11:30 schrieb Hans Hagen: >> >>> On 29-3-2012 10:46, Wolfgang Schuster wrote: >>> >>>> To many names aren’t a good solution but when I have to make a decision I >>>> would choose \definecounter because it’s the name which makes more sense. >>>> The only thing (besides backward compatibility) is the \makecounter >>>> mechanism which use the following commands: >>> >>> So will we drop the number ones then? >> >> This would only work when you also drop \makecounter because it won’t be >> usable anymore when \definenumber will be changed to \definecounter. > > Well, a direct consequence of removing all 'structure' from > 'structurecounter' is indeed that we get \definecounter and therefore need to > drop the ones in syst-aux (no big deal as they are only used a few times and > nowadays we have more than enough \count's; we can always turn them into > \definevaluecounter or so if needed). > > Anyhow, I already did a lot of editing so there's no going back now ... I'm > making a beta that you can check in a while. In the process > \currentstructurecounter has become \currentsectioncountervalue and some > macros got value appended as well.
It looks good and I will update my modules to use the new names but what’s with the following helper functions, will you provide synonyms for them or should I use these names (the commands are too useful to not use them myself): - \strc_counters_register_component - \strc_counter_setup_using_parameter - \strc_counter_preset_using_parameter Wolfgang _______________________________________________ dev-context mailing list dev-context@ntg.nl http://www.ntg.nl/mailman/listinfo/dev-context
