On 5/2/07, Irfan Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks. > > Can you point me to a scalable server environment for embedding xulrunner > without X or some other solution where a display isnt required? I need to > process lot of url's on the server. I require the dom and the coordinates of > the nodes. > No, I can't. If you figure something out, please write it down on MDC.
Nickolay > Nickolay Ponomarev wrote: > > On 5/2/07, Irfan Mohammed <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> http://www.mozilla.org/roadmap/gecko-1.9-roadmap.html#Embedding_and_application_deployment > >> > >> > >> I was referring to the "Embedding and application deployment" section > >> in the document. > >> > >> I am looking for a way to run the xulrunner without X. > >> > > I don't see anything about running headless in that section. > > > > In any case, that document is quite outdated and much of the stuff > > there is not happening it seems (like XBL2, XUL', JS2). FWIW, I have > > not heard anything about people working on running XR headless. Also > > might be interesting to you is: > > http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2006/07/the_good_the_bad_and_the_three.html > > > > which hints that making mozilla run headless is too much effort. > > > > Nickolay > > > >> > >> Nickolay Ponomarev wrote: > >> > On 1 May 2007 15:41:23 -0700, faayil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> >> One of the features targeted for xulrunner/gecko-sdk ver 1.9 is > >> >> running the xulrunner headless. Is this feature implemented in > >> >> xulrunner-1.9a5pre.en-US? > >> >> > >> > Targeted by who, may I ask? (And do you mean running without X or > >> > something else?) > >> > > >> > Nickolay > >> > > >> > > > _______________________________________________ dev-embedding mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-embedding
