It's true. We are required by COPPA legislation to implement a "neutral age
verification mechanism". Instead of using a date picker for a birthday
(which is usually three pulldowns) we chose something a little
unconventional that we hope causes more accurate input. We noticed that
Tumblr’s legal team seems to be okay with a simple: How old you are? <text
input> which I think might be even easier and end the grandpa comments. I
could check with legal.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:04 AM, Tarek Ziade <[email protected]> wrote:

>
>
> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 9:11 PM, Nicholas Alexander <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hey Tarek,
>>
>> On Sun, Feb 15, 2015 at 6:38 AM, Tarek Ziade <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey
>>>
>>> Someone tweeted me: https://twitter.com/johnke/status/566570679123058688
>>>
>>
>> Wow, that's quite a thread!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> and looking at a recent change in b2g about that
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gaia/commit/3afef63b0389b066f2bc1cc05944ffe1633caec9
>>>
>>> I am wondering: what's the rational behind "1990".. shouldn't it be 2002
>>> ?
>>> shouldn't we dynamically pull the "19xx and earlier" choice ?
>>>
>>
>> I think jgruen and rfeeley have the most UX context here, and presumably
>> there's a legal person with legal context we could ask.  I believe some of
>> the language in the Act requires service providers to not make it "easy" to
>> avoid the requirements of the act.  I know one concern was that identifying
>> exactly the magic year might be construed as violating COPPA.  That, for
>> example, is why essentially zero sites ask: "Are you 13 or older" -- it
>> leads the user too clearly.  There is some doubt as to whether asking per
>> year up until 13, and then having an "I'm old enough" category is also
>> violating.
>>
>
> Interesting.. (and quite odd :)) - we should simply display a floppy disk
> picture and ask them what it is. ;)
>
>
> I am adding Fernando to this thread since I guess b2g seems now slightly
> different in that aspect.
>
>
>
>>
>> Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer!
>>
>
>>
>>
>> Nick
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Dev-fxacct mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct
>
>
_______________________________________________
Dev-fxacct mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxacct

Reply via email to