Yeah mirroring is no good, if only RTL was so simple! I've not heard anyone squawk about landing 3-5MB more, but I'm not convinced that is a green light to just go ahead - based on the fallout last time. I guess what I'll do is look into adding some support in the FTU's build script to pick RTL or LTR and maybe a way to opt in to one or the other or both to give us and partners options for our builds and automation. If that turns out to be needless, well it will be easy to remove.
On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 9:03 AM, Augustin Trancart < [email protected]> wrote: > That won't be very good: not everything is mirrored in RTL. > - Basically, about 75% of the icons you can see if these videos are not > mirrored in RTL. > - Moreover, the videos shows the hour in latin numbers, which will be > mirrored, so not really readable. > - On the fifth video, Mozilla is displayed "Allizom". > > Imo, we'd better not reverse at all than giving the impression we were so > lazy we only did scaleX(-1). That's not a good first impression on our RTL > support ! > > Augustin Trancart > Phoxygen > > On 16/10/2015 11:16, Guillaume Marty wrote: > > Just a quick idea, can't we reverse the video with ` transform: > scaleX(-1);`? > That won't work for the the status bar and other elements, but this may be > acceptable for some of them. > > On 15 October 2015 at 19:44, Sam Foster <[email protected]> wrote: > >> For 2.5 we are trying to complete our RTL support. One of the open issues >> is what to do about the tutorial videos you see in both the >> first-time-experience, and an upgrade. These are abstracted enough to be >> locale-agnostic, but decidedly LTR. We would like to provide RTL versions, >> but including both in the build would add 3-5MB. >> >> The current compromise is to make the assets available in the repo for a >> motivated partner to swap out in their build, but exclude them by default. >> This would mean that a device configured for a primarily RTL market could >> have a sane default. But a user choosing a different locale/direction in >> the FTU would not see a corresponding change in the tutorial videos. >> >> So I want to confirm the assumptions here. Does adding 3-5MB of video >> assets really represent a problem? Life would be simpler if we could just >> decide what to show at runtime based on the current document direction. >> >> Some bugs for reference - >> * 1212963 – [FTE] FTE Videos for RTL | >> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212963> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1212963 >> * 1197991 – Make FTU tour a part of market customization options | >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1197991 >> * 1101119 – (upgrade-tutorial-rtl) [META] [RTL] Upgrade Tutorial | >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1101119 >> >> /Sam >> >> _______________________________________________ >> dev-fxos mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos >> >> > > > -- > Guillaume Marty > @g_marty > http://gu.illau.me > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing > [email protected]https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-fxos mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos > >
_______________________________________________ dev-fxos mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-fxos
