01.01.05 at 20:44, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin Foster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01.01.05:
>> 01.01.05 at 16:07, Michael Heydekamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> "postmaster/bitzbox.plus.com" would be the default display of the >>> personal mail folder (which can be changed to >>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in FreeXP >> It can be changed to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >> in FreeXP. > Yes... I should have said "If you would have disabled the 'Use > Envelope header' option and FreeXP would thus use the address from the > To: header, it could be changed to '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'". If I disable "Use Envelope header", mail is placed in "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" > But that was simply too long. ;) >>> but AFAIK not in XP2). >> It defaults to that so no, it can't :) > At least they seem to have implemented this feature a while ago (see > 'Usenet groups with "."' under C/D/N). The online help doesn't tell > anything about that this would also change the display of mail > folders, that's why I wasn't aware of that. They also have just this > one option while both FreeXP and OpenXP have two options. > But the default, I think, is that it is disabled in XP2? Yes, that's coreect. >>> In so far it surprises me that XP2 displays an "@" and OpenXP an >>> "/". >> Why does it surprise you? > See above. >>> But this is just a display issue. In the header of the mail reader >>> I'm seeing an "@" anyway. >> Yes, I understand all that but what I was getting at was why FreeXP >> puts "bi_plusn-bitzbox-" in front of the "real" email address. > It doesn't put anything in front of any address. As explained, it > just uses the address of the envelope header (because you have told > FreeXP to do so). >> I find this to be rather messy and untidy. > Disable the "Use Envelope Header" option for this server and you're > done. Nope, see above. > Or tell your mail provider to not generate Delivered-To: headers. That's not an option :) > And/or: > ----------8<---------- >> X-RFC-Converter: UUZ [FreeXP v3.40 RC3] @ 3108030130 > ----------8<---------- > Due to a number of reasons, you should download and use the latest > test version of the Enhanced UUZ. The behaviour with respect to > envelope headers for instance has changed in so far as any of the > other three envelope headers take precedence over a Delivered-To: > header, if both should exist (no matter in which order they appear). OK, I've done that but it doesn't make any difference. I've done a lot of testing and no matter what I do, I cannot get rid of "bi_plusn-bitzbox-" without resorting to using CrossSecretary. -- Martin --------------------------- FreeXP English Support Site http://www.freexp.co.uk -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ FreeXP Entwickler-Mailingliste [email protected] http://www.freexp.de/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev-list
