You have to remember - this is a beta release, and not 100% things will be
changing, and this is all a work in progress. It doesn't mean we're in
trouble - it's good to have extra eyes look over things :)
I appreciate your comments, the developers will pick up on this...
Charles Daminato
OpenSRS Support Manager
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Neil H. wrote:
> Boy are we all in trouble!
>
> Half asleep I went through Appendix A and what I have found is appalling. Simple
>mistakes that OpenSRS's developers have made that are unacceptable and if they can't
>get it right how do they expect us to get it. I would like to go on the record as
>saying this is a very bad idea. Hopefully I am wrong.... Here are my preliminary
>comments:
>
> Page 97 has Two errors:
>
>
> <!DOCTYPE OPS_envelope SYSTEM "ops.dtd">
>
>
>
> <OPS_envelope>
>
> <header>
>
> <version>1.0</version>
>
> <msg_id>112.12121493</msg_id>
>
> <msg_type>standard</msg_type>
>
> </header>
> <body>
> <data_block>
> <dt_assoc>
> <item key="domain_list">
> <dt_array>
> <item key="0">ns1.example.com</item>
> <item key="1">ns2.example.com</item>
> <item key="2">ns3.example.com</item>
> </dt_array>
> </item> <- This was missing
> </dt_assoc>
> </data_block>
> </body>
>
> Next block of code:
>
>
>
> <dt_assoc>
>
> <dt_assoc>
>
> <item key="owner">
>
> <dt_assoc>
>
> <item key="first_name">Tom</item>
>
> <item key="last_name">Jones</item>
>
> </dt_assoc>
>
> </item>
>
> <item key="tech">
>
> <dt_assoc>
>
> <item key="first_name">Devil</item>
>
> <item key="last_name">Woman</item>
>
> </dt_assoc>
>
> </item>
>
> </dt_assoc>
>
> </item> <--- Ohh here it was from the first piece of code. Looks like
>someone dropped it here by accident :) THis does not belong!!!!
>
> </OPS_envelope>
>
> Those are the code errors I have a few more problems that I will post in another
>message to follow.
>
>
>
> Neil
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
