Oh! I forgot... I know, I know, Chuck... I am red carded and out for the season... you do not need to say it... I already see it coming.
No more wise cracks from me ;-) It is all in good fun! Do not take me seriously I am just kidding ;0) Ben > "Fib" now that is a word we can all understand! F7 must not be working at > the moment. It is for me, however, so I will respond in kind and like your > first email. > > The indignation of the collaboration excreted by the exacerbation of the > most dignified manner leads me and my colleagues to conclude the > stupification of the emancipation proclamation... huh and as such chitty > chitty bang bang! > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Michael L. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "wholesaleurl.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 4:55 PM > Subject: Re: OpenSRS-SF > > > > let's see now -- tucows/opensrs is a wholesaler of domains, and you are > > buying from them? -- that sort of makes your domain name a big fib, right? > > who is kidding whom? > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "wholesaleurl.com" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:34 PM > > Subject: Fw: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > Did you use your F7 key in MS Word to find all those big words in your > > email > > > message? Cause us stupid folks dunno not anything know about what you > > > talking man! What the h*ll does "perception of your monumental missives > > > persuasive in the future" mean anyways? > > > > > > Please learn me! > > > > > > P.S. Sorry Chuck do not red card me I could not help myself. I have > read > > > to much nonsense about this issue not to ridicule it. I will stay quite > > for > > > another while. > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael L. Dean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Lynn W. Taylor" > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 3:16 PM > > > Subject: Re: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > please refer to opensrs first in your to: emails so that I don't get > > these > > > > trivial emails in my main window. It is getting tiresome. Better > yet, > > > > reply strictly to Lynn, et al ad infinitum so that I don't even get > your > > > > junk in my delete window. Realizing of course, that like garage > sales, > > > one > > > > person's junk is another's precious jewel. Perhaps you will find my > > > > perception of your monumental missives persuasive in the future and > > remain > > > > totally silent! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > To: "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:40 AM > > > > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks for the assist...the XML::Parser module is missing on Eric's > > > > > site...it is not used for the current version from the OpenSRS site. > > I > > > am > > > > > anxious to try out the billing code on the new stuff as well as > > > integrate > > > > my > > > > > enhancements using hooks so that I don't fall victim to the need to > > > > > constantly redo all my changes every time a new version is > > > > released...other > > > > > than those things, I too am happy with the current version. But my > > > > billing > > > > > system does need work and it seemed like a better investment of my > > time > > > to > > > > > upgrade and use the version coming out instead of reinventing > > everything > > > > the > > > > > next time we are forced to upgrade by significant enhancements/bug > > > fixes, > > > > > etc. > > > > > > > > > > Anyway...thanks for all the help...if(when) I get it working I will > > > > > contribute my 2cents as well...:) > > > > > > > > > > -bryanw > > > > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > > > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Lynn W. Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 12:35 PM > > > > > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Bryan, > > > > > > > > > > Eric has the appropriate modules already compiled -- he gave the URL > > in > > > an > > > > > earlier message. I think he's mentioned the SourceForge version as > > > well. > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure he'd like to know if any were missing. > > > > > > > > > > We're in no great rush to get on the SourceForge version as I don't > > > think > > > > it > > > > > adds much at this point, so I can't comment on it directly. > > > > > > > > > > -- Lynn > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Bryan Waters > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:28 AM > > > > > To: Lynn W. Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > Nope...missed the question. > > > > > > > > > > I'm running my entire site on NT using OpenSRS...i'm talking about > the > > > > > SourceForge version which is the next generation of OpenSRS...i'm > > trying > > > > to > > > > > upgrade. I have used Eric's site to great advantage in getting my > > > current > > > > > site up and running quickly. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks though... > > > > > > > > > > -bryanw > > > > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > > > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > > > Behalf Of Lynn W. Taylor > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 11:59 AM > > > > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure those who are successfully running NT will disagree. > > > > > > > > > > OpenSRS runs fine on NT. The appropriate documentation is at > > > > > http://www.atlcon.net/opensrs -- Eric Longman has done a great job > > > keeping > > > > > all of this current, and keeping the appropriate perl modules in PPM > > > > format > > > > > (so you don't have to build them). > > > > > > > > > > -- Lynn > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > From: Michael L. Dean > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:44 AM > > > > > To: Bryan Waters; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Subject: RE: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > my suggestion: move from NT for serious work. > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > > > From: "Bryan Waters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 9:33 AM > > > > > Subject: OpenSRS-SF > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I have been trying to get this to work on NT but am having a > helluva > > > > time > > > > > > finding the right versions of packages and modules for perl. The > > > > > automated > > > > > > install broke miserably but I manually built (with VC6) expat and > > the > > > > > > XML::Parser and got a lot of the packages installed but when I > > verify > > > I > > > > > get > > > > > > protocol not supported...from the code this looks like something > is > > > > wrong > > > > > > with the XML parser... > > > > > > > > > > > > Has anyone got any suggestions or has anyone else gotten this to > > work > > > on > > > > > NT? > > > > > > (docs say it should work fine) > > > > > > > > > > > > -bryanw > > > > > > HalfPriceNames Domain Registry > > > > > > http://www.halfpricenames.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > > > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On > > > > > > Behalf Of Colin Viebrock > > > > > > Sent: Thursday, November 15, 2001 10:06 AM > > > > > > To: Scott Allan > > > > > > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Subject: Re: Client innovation > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > 1. Hard cut: make SF official and only "innovate" on that > > version. > > > > > This > > > > > > > > would mean that any new functionality would only be developed > by > > > us > > > > > ion > > > > > > > > that code base > > > > > > > > > > > > > > My choice is this one.d > > > > > > > > > > > > I agree. Don't spread your resources thin (but do continue to > > support > > > > the > > > > > > old > > > > > > codebase). > > > > > > > > > > > > However, I think that there *might* be some issues between the SF > > > > > developers > > > > > > and > > > > > > some RSP developers who contribute patches back to OpenSRS (just > > read > > > > the > > > > > > archives > > > > > > for email from Joe Rhett for examples). > > > > > > > > > > > > I have no idea what the situation is, nor do I really care too > much. > > > > But > > > > > if > > > > > > OpenSRS > > > > > > is going to move into a more transparent development system like > > > > > > SourceForge, you > > > > > > will need to be prepared for Joe Public offering > > > > patches/suggestions/etc.. > > > > > > Not all > > > > > > developers work well in this environment. I hope the people > working > > > on > > > > > the > > > > > > SF client > > > > > > are ready to deal with this input, both technically and > personally. > > > > > > > > > > > > - Colin > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
