Given some of the feedback, I thought perhaps that we were out to lunch
and there was something wrong in our tests, but it does not look like it.
The test fails consistently, and I do not see anything wrong with the data
we are sending in the test. 'course that doesn't mean I'm not blinded by
a blatent error...
A reply and the corresponding request are included below.
The important details:
o The tech phone number we sent is '+1.2505987708'
o This bugs me: we did not specify a tech fax number. (We sent '')
$REPLY = {
'is_success' => '0',
'protocol' => 'XCP',
'object' => 'DOMAIN',
'response_text' => 'Invalid data',
'attributes' => {
'registration_text' => 'Invalid data',
'error' => 'tech phone is incorrect.<br>
tech fax is incorrect.<br>
',
'registration_code' => '465',
'id' => '471494',
'admin_email' => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
},
'response_code' => '465',
'transaction_id' => 'Tue Dec 10 22:44:51 2002_Child#82700_Request#1',
'action' => 'REPLY'
};
$REQUEST = {
'object' => 'domain',
'attributes' => {
'period' => 2,
'reg_username' => 'billybob',
'reg_type' => 'new',
'contact_set' => {
'tech' => {
'state' => 'BC',
'first_name' => 'Tech',
'country' => 'CA',
'language' => 'EN',
'address1' => '100 Christmas Ave.',
'address2' => '',
'last_name' => 'Support',
'address3' => '',
'fax' => '',
'postal_code' => 'v8v 9v9',
'city' => 'Victoria',
'email' => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'phone' => '+1.2505987708',
'org_name' => 'BareMetal.com Inc'
},
'admin' => {
'state' => 'BC',
'first_name' => 'Philip',
'country' => 'CA',
'address1' => '123 Granville St',
'address2' => 'P.O. 555',
'last_name' => 'Smith',
'address3' => '',
'fax' => '',
'postal_code' => 'V4T JFK',
'city' => 'Vancouver',
'email' => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'phone' => '+1.4165551122',
'org_name' => 'Ceasars Beer Land'
},
'billing' => {
'state' => 'BC',
'first_name' => 'Philip',
'country' => 'CA',
'address1' => '123 Granville St',
'address2' => 'P.O. 555',
'last_name' => 'Smith',
'address3' => '',
'fax' => '',
'postal_code' => 'V4T JFK',
'city' => 'Vancouver',
'same_as' => 'admin',
'email' => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'phone' => '+1.4165551122',
'org_name' => 'Ceasars Beer Land'
},
'owner' => {
'state' => 'BC',
'first_name' => 'Philip',
'country' => 'CA',
'address1' => '123 Granville St',
'address2' => 'P.O. 555',
'last_name' => 'Smith',
'address3' => '',
'fax' => '',
'postal_code' => 'V4T JFK',
'city' => 'Vancouver',
'same_as' => 'admin',
'email' => '[EMAIL PROTECTED]',
'phone' => '+1.4165551122',
'org_name' => 'Ceasars Beer Land'
}
},
'handle' => 'process',
'nameserver_list' => [
{
'sortorder' => 1,
'name' => 'ns1.domaindirect.com'
},
{
'sortorder' => 2,
'name' => 'ns2.domaindirect.com'
}
],
'tld_data' => {},
'reg_password' => 'cletus',
'domain' => 'bmd-zxbxwmyf.info',
'custom_nameservers' => 1
},
'registrant_ip' => undef,
'protocol' => 'XCP',
'action' => 'sw_register'
};
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Tim Woodcock [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BareMetal.com Inc. http://baremetal.com/
Software Development Team
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Message received 2002-12-10 from 'klaus rubba':
> Hi there,
>
> Looks like we're having a similar problem. Looking at my XML request I see
> I'm sending the phone number as:
>
> 1.780-467-1234
>
> This worked fine, a month ago, but like you, we haven't tested it since and
> until only recently. Looking at the latest documentation, they are asking
> for following format for .info domains:
>
> >>>>
> +CCC.ZZZZZZZZZZxYYYY, where 'C' is the numeric country phone code (up to
> three digits), 'Z' is the phone number up to 12 digits and 'Y' is the
> extension up to 4 digits; overall length max is 20 characters, including the
> '+', '.', and 'x' (if extension is present).
>
> NPA-NXX-XXXXxYYYY -- the "standard" phone format for North America -- This
> format is converted into the previous one by OpenSRS
> <<<<
>
> Maybe they stopped accepting dashes in the phone number? Got more strict
> about requiring the '+' at the beginning? Who know's...
>
> Klaus
>
>
>
> >From: Ewan Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Subject: .info phone/fax validation changed?
> >Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 16:43:30 -0800
> >
> >Hi list,
> >
> >In addition to my previous query, regarding the change in messages from
> >check_transfer, I'm also getting unexpected errors while testing .info
> >registrations on the horizon interface:
> >
> >tech phone is incorrect.
> >tech fax is incorrect.
> >
> >The phone number provided by our tests is in international format, and
> >has been used for quite some time.
> >
> >We haven't run tests against the horizon interface for about a month,
> >since we haven't made relavent changes at our end in that time, so I
> >don't know when these tests would have started failing.
> >
> >Has anyone else encountered this?
> >
> >--
> > // 2 _____________________________________________________________
> >// / \
> >\\/ / | Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere. |
> > \\/ \_________________________________ __________________________/
> > Ewan Edwards {e^2}, [EMAIL PROTECTED] |/
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Tired of spam? Get advanced junk mail protection with MSN 8.
> http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
>
