On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:44:16 -0800
 "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles,

Your earlier post said that you had an account just for your own use. That implies very little need for "integration" into any other application.
EXACTLY!
So why isn't there a *SIMPLE WAY* for me to code the most foundational thing a Tucows account is for: Register a domain name?!

I would still install the client, and use it to help decipher the protocols.
Please see my other comments.

As for "pseudo-" according to the Miriam-Webster it means "being apparently rather than actually as stated" -- and gives "SHAM" and "SPURIOUS."
Your being pedantic .....

So, you are saying that OpenSRS isn't a real registrar, they just appear to be.
No, I specifically said *I AM* a pseudo-registrar,

1) I *DO NOT* have to genuflect if ICANN looks in my direction

2) I do not have to set up and pay for a 24/7/365 Whois sever who's bandwidth gets used up by a bunch of idiot spammers that mine the whois for email addresses

3) Ahh, I've made my point ....




-- Lynn

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 16:34:13 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lynn,

Understood, but I do need to integrate the registration
functionality into a unique Windows application I have.
Thus PERL or PHP in any form is not possible, period.

I have just setup an enom reseller account to carry me
though until I have Tucows API running. If only the Tucows
API was as easy to deal with as enom ..... I suspect the
competition will eventually get Tucows to simplify, or
better document, their own API but I can't wait for that.

"pseudo-registrar" is not an intrinsically negative
statement so I honestly have no idea why "everyone at
TUCOWS" would take exception to my comment. Perhaps you
could explain this statement to me?

Thanks!

Charles

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 13:55:09 -0800
 "Lynn W. Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Charles,

I think everyone at TUCOWS would take exception to the
term "pseudo-registrar"....

If all you want to do is your own registrations, you may
want to take a very hard, serious look at running the
standard PERL client on your Windows box.

It works just fine, and while the *nix contingent is
usually the most vocal here, there are quite a few of us
running Windows.

I'm not exactly fluent in Perl, but we've been running
here for a couple of years.  It's no hassle.

-- Lynn

On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 15:05:09 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I beleive I understand the handshaking command set, but
sample can only make my task easier while imposing on you
even more.

I beleive I have a working Blowfish Encode / Decode
function and I did see the Dev-List message which
describes the necessary Private Key "pre-hash". So I'm
hoping I now just need the actual data to transport and
parse for results.

Bottom lines,

1) I simply have a personal reseller account with Tucows
so my needs are extremely simplistic. I use Tucows for
thier awsome service and the convienance of being a
pseudo-registrar.

2) I'm a "Widows person" with no available Perl or PHP
resources. I can't even exchange favors with a Linux
Buddy. ;-(

3) I have lots of successful Windows network coding
experiance, so TCPIP coding, etc, should be a non-issue
for me.

4) All I currently need to do (and for the forseeable
future) through automation is register new .Info domains.
If I ever need to do more then I'm betting the API can
empower me to modify a working .Info "regstration
system".

5) So I would like the most simplistic and sterile sample
message(s) / conversation needed to register a new .Info
domain via the OpenSRS API.

THANK YOU VERY MUCH for your help!

I really do appreciate any and all help you have time to
provide me with.

Charles


On Tue, 14 Jan 2003 11:35:03 -0500
Colin Viebrock <XXXXX> wrote:

Are you just looking for the .INFO reg command, XML-ized?
Or do you
need the entire handshaking command set too?

Appendix A of the API docs is helpful in figuring out the
XML format,
and Appendix C explains the handshaking process.*

- Colin

* NOTE: Section 11.2 of the API specification is no
longer
valid, and
should be ignored. Maybe Chuck can get someone at OpenSRS
to take that
out of the spec.





XXXXX wrote:

Tucows support suggested I join this list and ask the
following:

Can anyone *PLEASE* provide me a sample new (not renew or
transfer) .INFO domain registration request packet (non
encrypted of course) which gets sent to OpenSRS server,
and it's response packet (both success and failure).

Specifically the unencrypted version of the TCPIP packet
data that gets sent to the port 55000 server. I can then
us this as my template to perform the registration
process
using my own code and reseller ID information (obviously
your ID information is blank out if the sample packet).

Bottom line is that I have read though the OpenSRS API
document and, like many such documents, it assumes you
know what you are doing before you've ever done it --
Thus
it's just a referance document. Simply put this document
would be much more useful if it tied the document
together
with 1 or 2 *COMPLETE* send / receive examples. Perhaps
for something that every reseller is likely to do, like
register a new domain name .... Ok, I feel better now.
;-)

Thank you very much in advance for your help!

Charles






Reply via email to