ICANN does provide some contractual obligations on behalf of the registrar to support the registrant in obtaining the auth code (.info, in particular, comes to mind).
IT would be evidence of non-compliance with ICANN mandate, no? Charles Daminato TUCOWS Product Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Wed, 22 Jan 2003, Dave Warren wrote: > My only complaint is that the losing registrar can simply refuse to release > the auth codes and that's that. Right now you have at least a chance of > getting a transfer out of NetSol, assuming the planets are aligned. > > ---- Original Message ---- > From: "Charles Daminato" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 2:38 PM > Subject: <?spam=BCC> RE: Transfer Email > > > Well, at least the registrar has proof that someone with access to the > > AuthCode was involved ;) > > > > There are rumours that Verisign may be employing AuthCodes - I see > > this as a good thing. > > -- > I used to be indecisive, now I'm not so sure. > > >
