Assuming, of course that the whole challenge-response thing is a good idea.

There are lots of good ideas for fighting spam, and there are quite a few that are 
pretty broken.  This is one of them.

A better idea would be to get one of the (your expletive here) who perpetrate this 
kind of garbage, take 'em to Interop, or CES, rent a booth, get a bunch of Plastic 
baseball bats, and charge $1/swing, or 3 swings for $5.

But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.

-- Lynn

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 20:48:40 -0500, WebWiz wrote:
> Did you consider that maybe it would be more appropriate to whitelist
> emails that come from the discussion list?  As Lynn pointed out, your
> challenge is broken and appears to come from OpenSRS, rather than from
> you specifically.
> 
> If you don't want to receive emails from list members, perhaps you
> should drop off the list.  I consider it spectacularly rude for a list
> member to force other list members to authenticate before accepting
> their email.  Could you imagine the pandemonium if 10,000 list members
> all decided your way was a good approach?  Do you really think that I
> would respond to 10,000 challenges...even if it was just once?  Puhleeze.
> 
> Regards,
> Eric Longman
> Atl-Connect Internet Services
> 
> +----------------------------------------------------------+
> | Atl-Connect Internet Services      http://www.atlcon.net |
> | 3600 Dallas Hwy Ste 230 PMB288              770 590-0888 |
> | Marietta, GA 30064-1685               [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
> +----------------------------------------------------------+
> 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> FYI.
>> 
>> I used XV.NET to request confirmation from any sender. XV.NET confirm all
>> incoming mails before it will send to my inbox.
>> 
>> This is NOT from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 
>> Sorry for inconvenience.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Emil
>> 
>> www.needguide.com
>> 
>> 
>>>Of course, 99% of the spam we receive is from addresses mined from the
>>>web-based archive of this and other lists.
>>>
>>>So, pardon me from mentioning [EMAIL PROTECTED] but at least that will
>>>now get spidered along with my legit. address and possibly cut down on the
>>>garbage.
>>>
>>>-- Lynn
>>>
>>>On Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:31:24 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
>>>>Yes it is, it allows OpenSRS to filter our Spam from their mailing
>>>>lists...
>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>From: "Nicolas Ross" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 11:11 AM
>>>>Subject: Fw: Please confirm your email for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>What's this ?
>>>>>
>>>>>Is this legitimate ?
>>>>>
>>>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>>>From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>>>Sent: Monday, February 02, 2004 2:02 PM
>>>>>Subject: Please confirm your email for [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>This is a automated message from [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Due to the high rate of spam and viruses, we ask that you perform a
>>>>>
>>>>>ONE
>>>>>TIME ONLY verification of your email address.
>>>>>
>>>>>>We have chosen to use XV.NET (eXtreme Email Protection) as our
>>>>>
>>>>>Anti-Spam
>>>>>E-Mail filter due to the security and ease. We suggest you use it also!
>>>>>http://www.XV.net
>>>>>
>>>>>>Just click the link below to deliver the email message you have sent
>>>>
>>>>with
>>>>
>>>>>the subject:  Re: Exporting / getting admin names and email for domains
>>>>>in
>>>>>our profile
>>>>>
>>>>>>** YOU MUST CLICK THE LINK BELOW **
>>>>>
>>>>>(snip)
>>>>>
>>>>>>If you do not click the link below, your email will NOT be delivered
>>>>>
>>>>>to
>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>
>>>>>>Thank You,
>>>>>>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>>
>>>>>>The XV.NET (eXtreme Email Protection) E-mail Verifier.


Reply via email to