Dear Robert, Thanks for your suggestion and information on Opus format. We will put it into candidate list.
Dear all, Currently we will use getUserMedia/getUserMediaDevice from WebRTC to do INPUT part of audio recording. (But will omit the voice engine below MediaEngine class and create MediaEngineB2G for Recording Capture.) And use MediaStream Recording for OUTPUT part. Welcome for any suggestion or question. Thanks, Sincerely yours. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Timothy B. Terriberry" <[email protected]> To: "Marco Chen" <[email protected]> Cc: [email protected] Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2012 11:10:39 AM Subject: Re: Audio recording in B2G Robert O'Callahan wrote: > recordings in for B2G, and you suggested AAC. I think it might make more > sense to record in Opus format instead --- http://www.opus-codec.org/ --- To paraphrase EKR, "I'm derf and I approve this message" (sorry, it is election season in the US). > The only downside I can see is if users want to upload recorded audio files > to Web sites that don't support Opus but do support AAC. Is that likely to > be an issue? If so, we can probably make a short list of the most important sites and reach out to them about adding Opus support. Since AFAIK, most of them use one of the open-source media frameworks (FFmpeg, libav, gstreamer) for content ingestion, and those all support Opus, this should be straightforward to do. For anyone who doesn't use one of those frameworks, we have simple, stand-alone tools. _______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
