Hi Eric,

apologies for this very late reply to a post you sent a couple of months ago, 
but I only recently started trying to get DTLS working in Asterisk as well. I'm 
still stuck with a few other issues, but I'd like to focus on this one at first 
and then try and address the other ones in other posts.

I also noticed the missing setup attribute in the signaling coming from both 
Chrome and Firefox, which did confuse me (and Asterisk) a bit. A similar 
question on the discuss-webrtc group was answered by Justin Uberti, who told 
that right now the active/passive roles are basically determined out of the ICE 
roles: "Chrome uses the ICE roles to determine active vs passive; the 
CONTROLLED party takes the active role". Is this the same in Firefox as of now, 
or does your latest post in here still apply?

Just to clarify, since as you say that order has been reversed, does this mean 
that at the moment Firefox expects the caller to take the active role in DTLS, 
and the callee to take the passive role? I'm using the 23.0a1 nightly build 
from today.

Thanks,
Lorenzo


Il giorno venerdì 22 febbraio 2013 17:09:33 UTC+1, Eric Rescorla ha scritto:
> I should mention that we reversed this order about a month ago,
> 
> which may have been confusing to people. It was announced, but
> 
> maybe not as widely as one might have liked.
> 
> 
> 
> -Ekr
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Eric Rescorla <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> > Firefox currently treats the caller as the server and the callee as
> 
> > the client. (This is the recommended configuration from 5763).
> 
> > Eventually we will do RFC 4572 roles as defined in
> 
> > RFC 5763/5764.
> 
> >
> 
> > -Ekr
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Mamadou Diop <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> >
> 
> >> Hello,
> 
> >>
> 
> >> I'm using Nightly "22.0a1 (2013-02-20)" and making call from chrome to
> 
> >> FF through a gateway. The problem is that there is a role conflict in
> 
> >> DTLS. FF is the called party but is sends "Client Hello" message. Our
> 
> >> gateway uses rfc4145 to determine roles. If the remote party doesn't
> 
> >> support this rfc, we just consider that the called party is the server
> 
> >> and the calling the client.
> 
> >> Could someone explain how FF determines the roles?
> 
> >>
> 
> >> Regards,
> 
> >> _______________________________________________
> 
> >> dev-media mailing list
> 
> >> [email protected]
> 
> >> https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
> 
> >>
> 
> >
> 
> >
_______________________________________________
dev-media mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media

Reply via email to