On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 8:40 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Eric, > > apologies for this very late reply to a post you sent a couple of months > ago, but I only recently started trying to get DTLS working in Asterisk as > well. I'm still stuck with a few other issues, but I'd like to focus on > this one at first and then try and address the other ones in other posts. > > I also noticed the missing setup attribute in the signaling coming from > both Chrome and Firefox, which did confuse me (and Asterisk) a bit. A > similar question on the discuss-webrtc group was answered by Justin Uberti, > who told that right now the active/passive roles are basically determined > out of the ICE roles: "Chrome uses the ICE roles to determine active vs > passive; the CONTROLLED party takes the active role". Is this the same in > Firefox as of now, or does your latest post in here still apply? > > Just to clarify, since as you say that order has been reversed, does this > mean that at the moment Firefox expects the caller to take the active role > in DTLS, and the callee to take the passive role? I'm using the 23.0a1 > nightly build from today. >
I'm not sure what my latest post said, but Firefox assumes that the caller (who is generally the ICE controller) is the DTLS server (passive). This matches Chrome's behavior except in ICE conflicts. -Ekr _______________________________________________ dev-media mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-media
