Filed bugs:

*Bug 780227* <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780227> - MDN
doesn't support wiki-style markup editing

*Bug 780231* <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=780231> - MDN
uses HTML as its source format, making interop with wiki markups hard
  (blocks 780227)

Benoit

2012/8/3 Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoi...@gmail.com>

>
>
> 2012/8/3 Jeff Hammel <jham...@mozilla.com>
>
>> I would argue HTML is a good, or even great, backing format.  It's what
>> mozilla does.  It is a real standard. There are a plethora of tools to deal
>> with HTML documents. It is very malleable.  There is a clear DOM
>> translation to its markup.
>
>
> How is this compatible with the fact that earlier in this thread, it has
> been said that the fact that the HTML source of MDN pages was hard to
> translate to other markup languages, meaning that offering another markup
> editing option would be hard?
>
> Source formats should be easy to translate to other formats. HTML is
> mostly a final-form format, in this respect. HTML code generated by WYSIWYG
> editors even more so.
>
> Benoit
>
>
>
>>
>>  That said, we know that there are people that prefer MediaWiki and we'll
>>>> see if we can find a way to let people use some kind of tool that lets
>>>> them
>>>> paste MediaWiki syntax in and get it automatically converted into HTML.
>>>> But
>>>> that's not going to happen right away, since there are still some more
>>>> fundamental site features we need to work on.
>>>>
>>>> I know this is frustrating to some people that prefer MediaWiki syntax,
>>>> and we'll see what we can do. I just can't make any promises, and
>>>> obviously
>>>> anything we do manage to do won't be the same as a raw MediaWiki setup.
>>>>
>>>>  Even just minimal basic support for some mediawiki markup would make it
>>> more convenient for me to type documents in, than to have to type in HTML
>>> or use a WYSIWYG editor.
>>>
>>>> I'm surprised you hadn't heard of Kuma; we've been talking about it at
>>>> length for over a year, including posts to this very mailing list asking
>>>> for people to help us test it. This makes me feel sad since we worked so
>>>> hard to get the word out. :)
>>>>
>>>>  Nah, I don't read mailing lists carefully enough and I don't contribute
>>> much to MDN, so this only speaks of my own ignorance.
>>>
>>> Thanks for taking care of MDN!
>>> Benoit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>  Eric Shepherd
>>>> Developer Documentation Lead
>>>> Mozilla
>>>> http://www.bitstampede.com/
>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>> dev-platform mailing list
>>>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-platform<https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform>
>>>>
>>>>  ______________________________**_________________
>>> dev-platform mailing list
>>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>>> https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-platform<https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform>
>>>
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>> dev-platform mailing list
>> dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
>> https://lists.mozilla.org/**listinfo/dev-platform<https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform>
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform

Reply via email to