As a matter of fact, there was just a decision yesterday here at the London DOM work week to implement a cycle collector for workers. Kyle is doing it, and can probably fill in any necessary details. He says it "shouldn't be that hard."
bholley On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 11:27 PM, Robert O'Callahan <[email protected]>wrote: > We're going to want to add worker bindings for canvas (both 2D and WebGL). > Over time I expect we'll want worker versions of almost every popular DOM > API that doesn't actually require content/layout. We need to be able to > share code between worker and main-thread implementations as much as > possible. Right now a major blocker for that is that main-thread DOM APIs > require cycle collection and workers can't use cycle collection. So, what > are the prospects for supporting cycle collection in workers? (I'm talking > about independent cycle collectors for each thread, not any kind of > cross-thread CC.) > > Rob > -- > Wrfhf pnyyrq gurz gbtrgure naq fnvq, “Lbh xabj gung gur ehyref bs gur > Tragvyrf ybeq vg bire gurz, naq gurve uvtu bssvpvnyf rkrepvfr nhgubevgl > bire gurz. Abg fb jvgu lbh. Vafgrnq, jubrire jnagf gb orpbzr terng nzbat > lbh zhfg or lbhe freinag, naq jubrire jnagf gb or svefg zhfg or lbhe fynir > — whfg nf gur Fba bs Zna qvq abg pbzr gb or freirq, ohg gb freir, naq gb > tvir uvf yvsr nf n enafbz sbe znal.” [Znggurj 20:25-28] > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
