On 26/06/13 16:59, Ehsan Akhgari wrote: > For whatever it's worth, Blink has made the decision to implement Web > MIDI without receiving any feedback from us (and to the best of my > knowledge from other vendors),
I am not sure why implementing something should require that many rules as long as it doesn't ship. > and has also made the decision to ship > requestAutocomplete hoping that Hixie will add it to the spec before it > hits the Chrome release channel. This is not true, they pushed it to Canary-only [1]. This said, I am not sure that we should allow us to have a bad behaviour because we believe other groups have/had that behaviour. > So, are you proposing that we should give feedback on all APIs even if > they're not interesting to us? I'd be fine with that, but I don't think > we can assume that it will be reciprocated. This is a concern I share. [1] https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/forum/#!searchin/blink-dev/requestautocomplete/blink-dev/0TnqLOvC2ZY/Wf_c2GExrCoJ -- Mounir _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
