On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 12:34 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote:
> I strongly oppose to any requirement that would make ESR+2 (ESR31) not > build on the current Debian stable (gcc 4.7) and make ESR+1 (ESR24) not > build on the old Debian stable (gcc 4.4). We're not going to change the > requirements for the latter. And b2g still requires gcc 4.4 (with c++11) > support anyways. Until they switch to the same toolchain as android, > which is 4.7. > Why are you so opposed? I feel like I can give a lot of good reasons why such constraints are a net loss for us, but I am not sure what is driving the imposition of such constraints on us. Cheers, Brian -- Mozilla Networking/Crypto/Security (Necko/NSS/PSM) _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
