On 22/03/2014 07:30 , L. David Baron wrote:
I'm inclined to think that it's not worth putting up a massive fight over the group's organization here, which I think is what it would take to change this plan. I think I'd rather focus the bandwidth of our communication with W3C management on other issues.
I haven't tracked this group very closely, but my understanding is that the idea really is to operate as two subgroups, with the common venue mostly useful to ensure maximal IP coverage and workable conversion to WebVTT for people who have a large stake in TTML.
(On the other hand, I think it is worth listening to the real needs of producers who have large libraries of captions that they'd like to convert to WebVTT.)
It really is. There is a *lot* of high quality TTML content that currently isn't available on the Web. Making sure that it can be liberated would be very useful.
I suppose I should at least send late feedback over the decision process, and perhaps also that there should be more mention of the working group operating as two subgroups than "Teleconferences: Weekly for TTML, and as needed for WebVTT".
I think you'll be better off speaking directly to the group's chairs and team contacts than bringing further feedback into WBS.
-- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/ - @robinberjon _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
