On Jun 5, 2014, at 2:47 AM, Benoit Jacob <jacob.benoi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > 2014-06-04 20:28 GMT-04:00 Cameron McCormack <c...@mcc.id.au>: > On 05/06/14 07:20, Milan Sreckovic wrote: > In general, is “this is how it worked with SVGMatrix” one of the > design principles? > > I was hoping this would be the time matrix rotate() method goes to > radians, like the canvas rotate, and unlike SVGMatrix version that > takes degrees... > > By the way, in the SVG Working Group we have been discussing (but haven't > decided yet) whether to perform a wholesale overhaul of the SVG DOM. > > http://dev.w3.org/SVG/proposals/improving-svg-dom/ > > If we go through with that, then we could drop SVGMatrix and use DOMMatrix > (which wouldn't then need to be compatible with SVGMatrix) for all the SVG > DOM methods we wanted to retain that deal with matrices. I'm hoping we'll > resolve whether to go ahead with this at our next meeting, in August. > > Thanks, that's very interesting input in this thread, as the entire > conversation here has been based on the axiom that we have to keep > compatibility with SVGMatrix…. That is correct and still the case. Greetings, Dirk > > Benoit _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
