> On Mar 15, 2015, at 6:26 PM, Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <pidgeo...@gmail.com> wrote: > In general, std::pair should be preferred over mozilla::Pair unless you need > the empty type optimization.
If that’s the case, perhaps we should rename it to e.g. mozilla::CompactPair? It’s current name strongly suggests that it should serve as a replacement for std::pair. - Seth _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
