On 6/12/15 3:08 PM, L. David Baron wrote:
http://www.w3.org/2015/05/webperf-charter.html
So I have two main comments on the way this working group is operating. Not sure how these can/should be reflected in the charter.
1) The deliverables and their interrelationships are a bit of a mess. See the thread I started at <https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-web-perf/2015Jun/0057.html>. I would like the working group to explicitly pursue addressing those issues.
2) The way the working group operates in discussion terms seems to largely be through telecons. github issues are used some, but you have to know about them to pay attention to them, and they don't seem to be a common discussion venue anyway. The mailing list seems to be a bit of an afterthought, and it's not uncommon for mails to the list to be completely ignored by the editors of the relevant specifications. They've gotten a bit better on this front, but this is one of my main problems with this working group.
Past that, I think there should be something explicit in the deliverables about extending the various APIs involved to workers and about making it possible to map timestamps between timelines in different globals. This is already being worked on actively, so should not be controversial, but should be a bit more specific than just "incremental revisions to a bunch of specs".
-Boris _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
