Does anyone feel the changes to how intermittents are reported to bugs has affected things? We used to get a comment for each intermittent, but now its rolled up into a periodic summary. Perhaps people feel less urgency to fix things without the constant bugmail. Not that I want to advocate spam... but it is a recent change.
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 10:40 AM, Mike Conley <mcon...@mozilla.com> wrote: > I would support scheduled time[1] to do maintenance[2] and help improve our > developer tooling and documentation. I'm less sure how to integrate such a > thing in practice. > > [1]: A day, a week, heck maybe even a release cycle > [2]: Where maintenance is fixing oranges, closing out papercuts, > refactoring, etc. > > On 21 December 2015 at 17:35, <jmath...@mozilla.com> wrote: > > > On Monday, December 21, 2015 at 1:16:13 PM UTC-6, Kartikaya Gupta wrote: > > > So, I propose that we create an orangefactor threshold above which the > > > tree should just be closed until people start fixing intermittent > > > oranges. Thoughts? > > > > > > kats > > > > How about regularly scheduled test fix days where everyone drops what > they > > are doing and spends a day fixing tests? mc could be closed to everything > > except critical work and test fixes. Managers would be able to opt > > individuals out of this as needed but generally everyone would be > expected > > to take part. > > > > Jim > > _______________________________________________ > > dev-platform mailing list > > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > > > _______________________________________________ > dev-platform mailing list > dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org > https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform > _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
