On 3/9/16 3:06 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Not at all. xpcshell is not very useful for fuzzing. It is slow
OK, fair.
the sample tests (xpcshell-tests) are extremely complicated to adapt
That seems like it would be a problem in any new thing too, right?
and we can't easily use it with AFL.
Just to satisfy my curiosity, what is AFL?
but that still doesn't solve the problem that people have to write the necessary code that we can fuzz then.
OK. This is a problem, certainly, and pretty independent of both the "split Gecko" thing and the existence of shells, right?
What are the necessary qualities for things you can fuzz? -Boris _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
