On 2016-04-26 1:02 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:52:02PM -0400, Boris Zbarsky wrote: >> On 4/25/16 10:34 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: >>> Don't we already have that with superreviewers? >> >> Kinda, sorta. >> >>> (How outdated is that list, btw?) >> >> Quite. If we're talking about >> https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/about/governance/policies/reviewers/ then of >> the 30 people on the list, I would say: >> >> * 10 or 11 are no longer actively involved. >> * 4-5 are not actively involved in web-facing bits. >> * 2-3 are involved in web-facing bits in a pretty narrow capacity. >> >> If I were coming up with an "API owners" group, I'd take some of the people >> from this list, but also probably a few who are not on this list.... > > Shouldn't we just kind of repurpose the superreviewers, update the list, > and keep it fresh?
The traditional job of superreviewers is very different though (and it's mostly a historical thing anyway). _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
