On Tuesday, May 10, 2016 at 8:07:05 PM UTC-7, Mike Hommey wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:58:25PM -0400, Lawrence Mandel wrote: > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 6:43 AM, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 6, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Mike Hommey wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 06:01:12PM +1000, Xidorn Quan wrote: > > > > > > > > > > It's Firefox 48, three versions after ESR 45, which is roughly halfway > > > > > before the next ESR. > > > > > > > > 48 is the first version that will *not* have 10.6-10.8 support. > > > > > > > > > On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:28 PM, Ralph Giles wrote: > > > > The blog post just says "August 2016". Firefox 48 is scheduled for > > > > release August 2. Can you confirm that means we can start removing > > > > 10.6-10.8 support in mozilla-central now, which will be Firefox 49? > > > > > > This post reads to me that we start dropping 10.6~10.8 since Firefox 49, > > > so > > > Firefox 48 should be the last one with that support. Am I missing > > > something > > > here? > > > > > > > The post states "Mozilla will end support for Firefox on OS X 10.6, 10.7, > > and 10.8 in August, 2016." This means that we will end support with the > > Firefox 48 release. i.e. Firefox 48 will not support OS X 10.6-10.8. > > That's why the post should have given a version number instead of an > ambiguous date. > > Mike
I couldn't agree more. If you do not believe people can mix up and/or confuse what seems like an obvious statement or instructions, have a room full of college students read and explain it back to you. Any word on the ESR issue? _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
