On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Lawrence Mandel <lman...@mozilla.com> wrote:
> On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Mike Hommey <m...@glandium.org> wrote: > > > On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 05:18:17PM -0500, Adam Roach wrote: > > > On 5/3/16 4:59 PM, Justin Dolske wrote: > > > > On 5/3/16 12:21 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > > > > > > > > > * The update server has been reconfigured to not serve Nightly > > > > > updates to > > > > > 10.6-10.8 (bug 1269811) > > > > > > > > Are we going to be showing some kind of notice to affected users upon > > > > Release? That is, if I'm a 10.6 user and I update to Firefox 48, at > > some > > > > point should I see a message saying I'll no longer receive future > > > > updates? > > > > > > Even better, is there any way to get the update system to automatically > > move > > > such users over to 45ESR? > > > > Did we introduce changes to profile data between 45 and 48? Because > > that usually breaks downgrade paths. > > > > We discussed this earlier and decided that we were not going to > automatically move users from Firefox to ESR. For one thing, the user has > not opted to be on this channel. A channel change also involves both > engineering and test work. It does seem prudent to test the scenario to > know whether users can move from 47 to ESR 45.2.0 without issue. Is it feasible to make 48 an ESR as well so that we don't need to ask users to downgrade it to ESR 45? - Xidorn _______________________________________________ dev-platform mailing list dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
